Fusion des dualités : comment les points de convergences de l’art et de la science peuvent (res)susciter l’engouement des femmes pour le domaine STIM.
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
Comment l’interrelation des réservoirs de connaissance peut-elle contribuer à motiver les jeunes femmes qui se désintéressent de la science ? Cette étude relate comment les points de convergence des diverses pratiques de recherche dans le domaine des arts et de la science peuvent atténuer les stéréotypes de genre associés à la filière STIM. L’étude du cas de quatre femmes œuvrant au point de convergence de l’art et de la science a mis en évidence les aspects communs de leurs pratiques : l’appréciation du monde naturel, un sens de l’esthétique, une pratique du dessin et l’utilisation de questions de recherche pertinentes, ce qui laisse supposer certains ponts entre ces deux domaines d’étude.
Téléchargements
Renseignements sur l'article
Cette œuvre est protégée sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
The copyright notice is CC BY SA.
This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. All new works based on yours will carry the same license. Thus any derivatives will also allow commercial use. For example, if someone translates your article into French, the French version of the article will also have to be shared under a CC BY SA license.
Références
Billingham, J. (2014), SETI: The NASA Years, in D.A. Vokoch (Ed.), Archaeology, Anthropology, and Interstellar Communication, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Publishers), [e-book, pdf] Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/sites default/files/files Archaeology_Anthropology_and_Interstellar_Communication_TAGGED.pdf.
Born, G., Barry, A., (2010). Art-Science: From Public Understanding to Public Experiment, Journal of Cultural Economy, 3 (1), 103-119.
Butlr, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cole, K. C., (2009). Something Incredibly Wonderful Happens: Frank Oppenheimer and the World He Made Up. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Cooper, R. & Heaverlo, C. (2013). Problem Solving And Creativity And Design: What Influence Do They Have On Girls’ Interest In STEM Subject Areas? American Journal of Engineering Education 4(1) 27-38.
Ede, S. (2005). Art and Science. London, UK: I. B. Tauris
Edwards, David A. (2008). Artscience: Creativity in the Post-Google Generation. Harvard University Press.
Else, J., (Director). (1982) Palace of Delights [TV Documentary] USA: PBS "Nova." retrieved December 10, 2016 from https://www.exploratorium.edu/video/palace-delights.
Fink, J. L. W. (2015). Girls Rock STEM. Scholastic Instructor 124(5) 22-25
Haraway, D., (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Priviledge of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575-599.
Haraway, D.,(1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century, in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge.
Harding, S., (1993). Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity”?, in Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter, (Eds), Feminist Epistemologies. Routledge.
Harding, S., (1995). Strong objectivity: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese 104 (3), 331 - 349.
Juarrero, A. (2002). Complex dynamical systems and the problem of identity. Emergence, 4, 94–104.
Kessels, U. (2014). Bridging the Gap by Enhancing the Fit: How Stereotypes about STEM Clash with Stereotypes about Girls. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 7(2) 280-296.
Leaper, C., Timea, F., Spears Brown, C. (2012). Journal of Youth & Adolescence (41), 268–282, DOI 10.1007/s10964-011-9693-z.
Lee, E. (2016). Raising STEM Daughters. Working Mother, February/March 48-52.
Miller, A. I., (2014). Colliding Worlds: How Cutting-Edge Science is Redefining Contemporary Art. W. W. Norton & Company, 1st edition.
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canada (NSERC) (2017). Women in Science and Engineering in Canada. Ottawa, ONT: NSERC.
Oyserman, D., Elmore, K., Smith, G., (2012). Self, Self-concept, and Identity, in Handbook of Self and Identity, Mark R. Leary and June Price Tangney (Eds). New York, London: Guilford Press.
Pierson, T., (n.d.), The Birth of the SETI Institute, retrieved June 27, 2016 from http://www.seti.org/origin-of-the-institute.
Sagan, C. (1985). Contact. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Saldaña, J, (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications: London, England.
Schiebinger, L., Schraudner, M., (2011). Interdisciplinary Approaches to Achieving Gendered Innovations in Science, Medicine, and Engineering. Institute of Materials, Minerals, and Mining, Maney (publishers).
Jill Tarter - Beating the Odds, (n. d.), retrieved June 5, 2017 from https://www.seti.org/seti- institute/project/details/jill-tarter-–-beating-odds.
Wilson, B., Hawkins, B., Sim, S., (2015). Art, Science, and Communities of Practice. Leonardo, 48 (2), 152-157.
Yancey Martin, P., (2003). “Said and Done” Versus “Saying and Doing” Gendering Practices, Practising Gender at Work. Gender & Society, 1 (3) 342-377.