Exploration de programmes d’esthétisme visuel et poétique
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
J’analyse dans cet article le rôle des arts visuels dans l’orientation future des arts littéraires dans le contexte de ma classe de formation initiale des enseignants. Je donne un aperçu d’un programme transdisciplinaire en analysant le lien théorique et pratique entre l’esthétisme visuel et l’esthétisme poétique. Nous pouvons, grâce à l’imagination, devenir des raconteurs critiques par le biais de la poésie ekphrasique, c’est-à-dire par le biais d’une réaction poétique vis-à-vis une forme d’art. En bout de ligne, nous modifions et élargissons la pratique pour y inclure les réactions face à la photographie ou à des œuvres d’art, qui sont elles-mêmes des interprétations esthétiques.
Mots-clés : arts, éducation, imagination, poésie ekphrasique, curriculum.
Téléchargements
Renseignements sur l'article
Cette œuvre est protégée sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
The copyright notice is CC BY SA.
This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. All new works based on yours will carry the same license. Thus any derivatives will also allow commercial use. For example, if someone translates your article into French, the French version of the article will also have to be shared under a CC BY SA license.
Références
Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous. New York: Random House.
Barone, T. (2000). Breaking the mold: The new American student as strong poet. In T. Barone, Aesthetics, politics and educational inquiry: Essays and examples. (pp. 119-134). New York: Peter Lang.
Barry, P. (2002). Contemporary poetry and ekphrasis. The Cambridge Quarterly, 31(2), 155-165. doi: 10.1093/camqtly/31.2.155
Benton, M. (2017). Reading poems, reading paintings: anyone for ekphrasis? In Studies in the Spectator Role (pp. 56-66). New York: Routledge.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carlson, J. (2010). Songs that teach: Using song-poems to teach critically. English
Journal, 99(4), 65-71. doi: 10.2307/27807169
Christensen, J., Cox, C., & Szabo-Jones, L. (2018). Activating the heart: Storytelling,
knowledge sharing and relationship. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Culler, J. (1997). Literary theory: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton Balch.
Dolin, S. (2017). The Ekphrastic Moment. The Hopkins Review, 10(3), 339-354. doi: 10.1353/thr.2017.0076
Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
Ekphrasis. (n.d.). In The Oxford English Dictionary (3rd Online Ed.). Retrieved from http://www.oed/com/ekphrasis
Greene, M. (2001). Variations on a blue guitar: The Lincoln Center Institute lectures on
aesthetic education. Williston, VT: Teachers College Press.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and
social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Heard, G. (2016). Heart maps: Helping students create & craft authentic writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hovanec, J. (2016). The art of words: Ekphrasis in action! Art Education, 69(6), 21-27.
doi: 10.1090/00043125.2016.1224847?src=recsys
Inquiry. (1989). The Oxford English Dictionary. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Iser, W. (1989). Prospecting: From reader response to literary anthropology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Iser, W. (1993). The fictive and the imaginary: Charting literary anthropology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Krieger, M. & Krieger, J. (1992). Ekphrasis: the illusion of the natural sign. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Krieger, M. (1967). Ekphrasis and the still movement of poetry; or, Laokoon revisited. In P. W. Frederick (Ed.), The poet as critic (pp. 3-26). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Kulnieks, A., Longboat, D., & Young, K. (2013). Contemporary studies in environmental and indigenous pedagogies: A curricula of stories and place. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Kulnieks, A. & Young, K. (2014). Ekphrastic poetics: Fostering a curriculum of ecological awareness through poetic inquiry. in education, 20(2), 78-89.
Leggo, C. (1999). Research as poetic rumination: Twenty-six ways of listening to light. The Journal of Educational Thought, 33(2), 113-133.
Langer, S. (1953). Feeling and form: A theory of art. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. New York: Crossing Press.
Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods. Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. New York: Algonquin Books.
Mathur, D. (2017). Ekphrasis: Poetry That Deciphers Art. Motifs: An International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), 73-77. doi: 10.5958/2454-1753.2017.00010.1
McLean, D. (1971). “Vincent”. In American Pie. Universal Music Publishing Company. Santa Monica: California.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ministry of Education. (2013). Supporting minds: An educator’s guide to promoting students’ mental health and well-being. Retrieved from: http://www.ontario.ca/edu
Mitchell, W. J. (1994). Ekphrasis and the Other. In Picture theory: Essays on verbal and
visual representation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Moorman, H. (2006). Backing into ekphrasis: Reading and writing poetry about visual
art. English Journal, 46-53. doi: 10.2307/30046662
Orr, D. (1992). Ecological Literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world.
New York: SUNY
Prendergast, M. (2006). Found poetry as literature review: Research poems on audience
and performance. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 369-388. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284601
Prendergast, M. (2004). Inquiry and poetry: Haiku on audience and performance in
education. Language and Literacy, 6(1). Doi: 10.20360/g2rk52
Pinar, W. F. and M.R. Grumet. (1976). Toward a poor curriculum. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Pinar, W. et al. (1995). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
Rich, A. (1993). What is found there: Notebooks on poetry and politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Richardson, L. (1992). The consequences of poetic representation: Writing the other, rewriting the self. In C. Ellis & M. G. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience, (pp. 125-137). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars. New York: Random House.
van Gogh, V. Starry Night. Retrieved from:
Wiebe, S. (2015). Poetic inquiry: A fierce, tender, and mischievous relationship with
lived experience. Language and Literacy, 17(3), 152. doi: 10.20360/g2vp4n
Wiebe, S., & Snowber, C. (2012). En/lived vulnere: A poetic of impossible pedagogies. In S. Thomas, A. Cole, & S. Stewart (Eds.), The Art of Poetic Inquiry (pp. 446-
. Halifax, NS: Backalong Books.
Young, K. (2014). Vistas: An ecology of landscape. Unpublished Manuscript.
Young, K. (2012). Evoking the literary imagination in English secondary classrooms. In
K. James, C. Leggo, & T. Dobson (Eds.), English in middle and secondary classrooms: Creative and critical advice from Canada’s teacher educators (pp. 142-145). Toronto: Pearson Educational Press.
Young, K. (2006). The pedagogic force of ekphrastic poetics. Language & Literacy: A Canadian Educational E-Journal, 8(20), 1-18.
Young, K. (2002). Jubilation Thrives. CORE (York University’s newsletter on university Teaching), 13(2), 4.
Young, K. (Photographer). (2001). Artistic Response to 9/11 New York City. [Photograph]. CORE (York University’s newsletter on university teaching), 13(2), 4.