Conducting a Dissertation by Implication: Showing Up as Relational Method in Community-Engaged Arts-Based Research

Main Article Content

David LeRue
Arianna García-Fialdini

Abstract

Developing arts-based research that integrates community members making and testimony requires finding willing and eager participants. While existing scholarship in community-based art education emphasizes the need for ethical engagement with participants and communities, it often frames finding community partners as a logistical hurdle rather than a relational endeavour. This paper draws on two embedded arts-based doctoral dissertations to propose ‘showing up’ and getting involved in community as a relational approach to embedding for community-engaged arts-based research situated within broader forms of relational ethnography. We argue getting involved offers core benefits for researchers and community sites, and propose strategies for arts-based researchers developing community projects. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
LeRue, D., & García-Fialdini, A. (2026). Conducting a Dissertation by Implication: Showing Up as Relational Method in Community-Engaged Arts-Based Research . The Canadian Review of Art Education, 52(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.26443/crae.v52i1.2515
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

David LeRue, Concordia University

David LeRue (MFA, Ph.D.) is an Assistant Professor of Art Education at Concordia University in Montreal, Quebec. He has a background as both a community-based art educator and a painter, holding a BFA from NSCAD University and an MFA from Concordia University in painting and drawing. His research bridges qualitative and arts-based methodologies, with a special focus on participatory arts-based methods, constructivist grounded theory, and urban studies. His recent projects studied the changing landscape of Montréal’s Sud-Ouest, bridging oral history and participatory artmaking to ask how artmaking can serve as a form of testimony. His personal, in-situ landscape painting engaged similar questions, investigating how landscape painting can reveal insights into the built environment. His most recent SSHRC funded project, Theorizing the Craft of Studio Teaching, brings teachers from across contexts into dialogue with each other to foster cross-contextual pedagogical insights and a grounded theory of artist-teacher education.

Arianna García-Fialdini, Concordia University

Arianna Garcia-Fialdini, PhD, is a multidisciplinary artist, researcher, educator, and mother working predominantly in paint and print media. She holds a PhD in Art Education from Concordia University and an MFA in Studio Arts from the Burren College of Art, Ireland. Her research and studio practice translate diverse oral histories of hope and justice movements into multi-modal images that agitate, provoke, and inspire. Focusing closely on social change and gender-based violence, her visual work examines the lived experiences of women, immigrants, and refugee claimants. As a community art educator and current elementary and middle school visual arts instructor in North York, Ontario, Arianna uses her teaching and studio practice as an alternative platform to project marginalized voices, nurture creative thinking, and foster meaningful connection through shared art-making.

References

Bessant, K. C. (2014). The Relational Genesis of Community: Self-Other Dialogue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24(6), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2185

Brown, A. (2017). Emergent strategy: Shaping change, changing worlds. AK Press.

Campano, G., Ghiso, M. P., & Welch, B. J. (2016). Partnering with immigrant communities: Action through literacy. Teachers College Press.

Celikates, R. (2018). Critique as social practice: Critical theory and social self-understanding (N. S. Flynn, Trans.). Rowman & Littlefield.

Chapman, O., & Sawchuk, K. (2012). Research-creation: Intervention, analysis and “family resemblances.” Canadian Journal of Communication, 37(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2012v37n1a2489

Charmaz, K. (2023). Constructing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cerrucha. (n.d). Artista y activista Feminista. https://www.cerrucha.com/

Cobigo, V., Martin, L., & Mcheimech, R. (2016). Understanding community. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 5(4), 181-203. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v5i4.318

Darts, D. (2006). Art education for a change: Contemporary issues and the visual arts. Art Education, 59(5), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2005.11651605

Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43(5), 547-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9232-5

Drevdahl, D. J. (2002). Home and border: The contradictions of community. Advances in Nursing Science, 24(3), 8-20.

Dutta, U. (2021). The politics and poetics of “fieldnotes”: Decolonizing ethnographic knowing. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 598-607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420935919

Egbert, J., & Sanden, S. (2019). Foundations of education research: Understanding theoretical components. Routledge.

Garcia-Fialdini, A. (2018). Educating diversely: The artist talk platform. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.2458/jcrae.4866

Garcia-Fialdini, A. (2025). Preparing, Serving, and Sharing Stories: Immigrants’ Exploration of identity through Art–making, Oral History, Food, and Memory (Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University).

Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief, 3(3), 143-168.

Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. University of Minnesota Press.

Günel, G., Varma, S., & Watanabe, C. (2020). A manifesto for patchwork ethnography. Society for Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/a-manifesto-for-patchwork-ethnography

Günel, G., & Watanabe, C. (2023). Patchwork ethnography. American Ethnologist, 51(1), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.13243

Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (Fourth edition). Routledge.

High, S. (2014). Oral history at the crossroads: Sharing life stories of survival and displacement. UBC Press.

High, S. (2021). Oral history as creative practice at Concordia University’s Centre for Oral History and Digital Storytelling. Sonorités, (47), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.4000/afas.6359

High, S. (2022). Deindustrializing Montreal: Entangled histories of race, residence, and class (Vol. 40). McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.

Hunter, C. L. (2018). Gauging the Gatekeepers. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, (Vol. 2), 137-152.

Hochtritt, L., Ahlschwede, W., Halsey‐Dutton, B., Fiesel, L. M., Chevalier, L., Miller, T., & Farrar, C. (2018). Public pedagogy and social justice in arts education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(2), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12120

Irwin, R. L. (2022). Action research and arts based research: Bringing research to life. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 22(3), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v22i3.636

James, C. L. R. (1948). Notes on dialectics: Hegel, Marx, Lenin. [Self published /Mimeographed].

Jewkes, R., & Murcott, A. (1996). Meanings of community. Social Science & Medicine, 43(4), 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00439-4

Klykken, F. H. (2022). Implementing continuous consent in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 22(5), 795-810. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211014366

Krensky, B., & Steffen, S. L. (2009). Engaging classrooms and communities through art: The guide to designing and implementing community-based art education. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.

Lawless, E. J. (2000). "Reciprocal" ethnography: No one said it was easy. Journal of Folklore Research, 197-205.

Lawless, E. J. (2019). Reciprocal ethnography and the power of women's narratives. Indiana University Press.

Lawton, P. (2010). Hand-in-hand: Building community on common ground. Art Education, 63(6), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2010.11519096

Lawton, P. H., Walker, M. A., & Green, M. (2019). Community-based art education across the lifespan: Finding common ground. Teachers College Press.

Leavy, P. (2019). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guildford Press.

Leavy, P. (2020). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

LeRue, D. (2023a). Landscaping the city: Place-based online learning in the time of pandemic. Canadian Art Teacher, 19(1), 7-11.

LeRue, D. (2023b). Meaning and making: Laying the groundwork for community-based research-creation. LEARNin, Landscapes, 16(1), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v16i1.1096

LeRue, D., Wells, C., Urquhart, K., Kim, J. K., Shanahan, B., Aresnault-May, S., & Kuehn, N. (2024). Community-Based Art Education in a Pandemic World. Doing Arts Thinking: Arts Practice, Research and Education, 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004685253_006

LeRue, D. (2024). Landscape as method and model: Developing research-creation in community through landscape painting and pedagogy in Montréal’s Sud Ouest. Concordia University (Canada).

Lombard, L. (2025). The interpretation of relationships: Fieldwork as boundary-negotiation. Ethnography, 26(3), 582-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381211069670

Lombardo, C., Novak, P., Flicker, S. & Making With Place Artists (2023). Making With Place: Youth Public Art Experiments. Art/Research International, 8(1), 142–172. https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29702

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

McGowan, T. (2024). Embracing Alienation: Why We Shouldn't Try to Find Ourselves. Watkins Media Limited.

Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge.

Owton, H., & Allen-Collinson, J. (2014). Close but not too close: Friendship as method(ology) in ethnographic research encounters. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), 283-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613495410

Paris, D., & Winn, M.T. (Eds.). (2013). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. SAGE Publications.

Peña, N. S. (2023). Cerrucha's" Trinchera". A Feminist Artistic Response to the War Against Women. Asparkia: Investigació feminista, (43), 63-85. 10.6035/aSparkIa.7004

Pugh, A. J., & Mosseri, S. (2023). Trust-building vs. “just trust me”: Reflexivity and resonance in ethnography. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi:10.3389/fsoc.2023.1069305

Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more-than-human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.

Reeves, C. L. (2010). A difficult negotiation: Fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative research, 10(3), 315-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109360150

Schiavo, R. (2021). What is true community engagement and why it matters (now more than ever). Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 14(2), 91-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2021.1935569

Sévigny, M. (2021). La trajectoire incertaine du Projet Bâtiment 7. Revue Possibles, 45(2), 42-50.

Sihlongonyane, M. F. (2009). ‘Community development’ as a buzz-word. Development in Practice, 19(2), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520802689378

Singh, S., & Wassenaar, D. R. (2016). Contextualising the role of the gatekeeper in social science research. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 9(1), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.465

Springgay, S., & Truman, S.E. (2018). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: Walkinglab. Routledge.

Strawn, C. (1994). Beyond the buzz word: Empowerment in community outreach and education. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30(2), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886394302002

Parsons, T. (1991). The social system (New ed). Routledge.

Tri-council policy statement ethical conduct for research involving humans. (2022). [Policy Document]. Government of Canada. https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/documents/tcps2-2022-en.pdf

Tillman-Healy, L. M. (2003). Friendship as method. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(5), 729-749. http://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403254894

Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal and contingency. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811- 818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530265

Ulbricht, J. (2005). What is community-based art education? Art Education, 58(2), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2005.11651529

Ulmer, J.B. (2017). Posthumanism as research methodology: Inquiry in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(9), 832-848. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1336806

Vaughan, K., Dufour, E., & Hammond, C. (2016). The “art” of the right to the city: Interdisciplinary teaching and learning in Pointe-St-Charles. LEARNing Landscapes, 10(1), 387-418. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v10i1.739

Wang, C., & Burris, M.A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309

Wheatley, M. J. (2002). Turning to one another: Simple conversations to restore hope to the future. Berrett- Koehler Publishers.

Wolffer, L. (2022). Diarias Global Afuera [Participatory photography]. Ex-convent of El Carmen and Revolución Park, Jalisco Secretariat of Culture, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. https://lorenawolffer.net/2023/02/08/diarias-global-afuera/

Wolffer, L. (2025, September 27). About Lorena Wolffer. https://lorenawolffer.net/en/inicio-english/

Yow, V.R. (2014). Recording oral history: A guide for the humanities and social sciences (3rd ed.). Rowan & Littlefield.