Mener une thèse par implication : se rendre présent·e comme méthode relationnelle dans la recherche artistique participative menée avec les communautés
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
Une recherche fondée sur les arts qui intègre témoignages et création communautaire requiert la participation de personnes enthousiastes et motivées. Si l’art professoral en éducation artistique communautaire privilégie l’engagement éthique auprès des participants et des communautés, le recrutement de partenaires communautaires est souvent perçu comme un obstacle plutôt qu’une démarche relationnelle. Le présent article s’inspire de deux thèses de doctorat sur les arts pour faire de « se présenter » une métaphore clé et une méthode fondatrice de recherche artistique ancrée dans la communauté. Nous y voyons une approche relationnelle permettant d’intégrer la recherche-création communautaire par laquelle les chercheurs s’impliquent directement dans les communautés étudiées pour la situer dans un contexte plus large d’ethnographie relationnelle.
Téléchargements
Renseignements sur l'article
Cette œuvre est protégée sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
The copyright notice is CC BY SA.
This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. All new works based on yours will carry the same license. Thus any derivatives will also allow commercial use. For example, if someone translates your article into French, the French version of the article will also have to be shared under a CC BY SA license.
##plugins.generic.funding.fundingData##
Références
Bessant, K. C. (2014). The Relational Genesis of Community: Self-Other Dialogue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24(6), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2185
Brown, A. (2017). Emergent strategy: Shaping change, changing worlds. AK Press.
Campano, G., Ghiso, M. P., & Welch, B. J. (2016). Partnering with immigrant communities: Action through literacy. Teachers College Press.
Celikates, R. (2018). Critique as social practice: Critical theory and social self-understanding (N. S. Flynn, Trans.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Chapman, O., & Sawchuk, K. (2012). Research-creation: Intervention, analysis and “family resemblances.” Canadian Journal of Communication, 37(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2012v37n1a2489
Charmaz, K. (2023). Constructing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cerrucha. (n.d). Artista y activista Feminista. https://www.cerrucha.com/
Cobigo, V., Martin, L., & Mcheimech, R. (2016). Understanding community. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 5(4), 181-203. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v5i4.318
Darts, D. (2006). Art education for a change: Contemporary issues and the visual arts. Art Education, 59(5), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2005.11651605
Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43(5), 547-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9232-5
Drevdahl, D. J. (2002). Home and border: The contradictions of community. Advances in Nursing Science, 24(3), 8-20.
Dutta, U. (2021). The politics and poetics of “fieldnotes”: Decolonizing ethnographic knowing. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 598-607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420935919
Egbert, J., & Sanden, S. (2019). Foundations of education research: Understanding theoretical components. Routledge.
Garcia-Fialdini, A. (2018). Educating diversely: The artist talk platform. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.2458/jcrae.4866
Garcia-Fialdini, A. (2025). Preparing, Serving, and Sharing Stories: Immigrants’ Exploration of identity through Art–making, Oral History, Food, and Memory (Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University).
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief, 3(3), 143-168.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. University of Minnesota Press.
Günel, G., Varma, S., & Watanabe, C. (2020). A manifesto for patchwork ethnography. Society for Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/a-manifesto-for-patchwork-ethnography
Günel, G., & Watanabe, C. (2023). Patchwork ethnography. American Ethnologist, 51(1), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.13243
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (Fourth edition). Routledge.
High, S. (2014). Oral history at the crossroads: Sharing life stories of survival and displacement. UBC Press.
High, S. (2021). Oral history as creative practice at Concordia University’s Centre for Oral History and Digital Storytelling. Sonorités, (47), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.4000/afas.6359
High, S. (2022). Deindustrializing Montreal: Entangled histories of race, residence, and class (Vol. 40). McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
Hunter, C. L. (2018). Gauging the Gatekeepers. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, (Vol. 2), 137-152.
Hochtritt, L., Ahlschwede, W., Halsey‐Dutton, B., Fiesel, L. M., Chevalier, L., Miller, T., & Farrar, C. (2018). Public pedagogy and social justice in arts education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(2), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12120
Irwin, R. L. (2022). Action research and arts based research: Bringing research to life. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 22(3), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v22i3.636
James, C. L. R. (1948). Notes on dialectics: Hegel, Marx, Lenin. [Self published /Mimeographed].
Jewkes, R., & Murcott, A. (1996). Meanings of community. Social Science & Medicine, 43(4), 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00439-4
Klykken, F. H. (2022). Implementing continuous consent in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 22(5), 795-810. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211014366
Krensky, B., & Steffen, S. L. (2009). Engaging classrooms and communities through art: The guide to designing and implementing community-based art education. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
Lawless, E. J. (2000). "Reciprocal" ethnography: No one said it was easy. Journal of Folklore Research, 197-205.
Lawless, E. J. (2019). Reciprocal ethnography and the power of women's narratives. Indiana University Press.
Lawton, P. (2010). Hand-in-hand: Building community on common ground. Art Education, 63(6), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2010.11519096
Lawton, P. H., Walker, M. A., & Green, M. (2019). Community-based art education across the lifespan: Finding common ground. Teachers College Press.
Leavy, P. (2019). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guildford Press.
Leavy, P. (2020). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
LeRue, D. (2023a). Landscaping the city: Place-based online learning in the time of pandemic. Canadian Art Teacher, 19(1), 7-11.
LeRue, D. (2023b). Meaning and making: Laying the groundwork for community-based research-creation. LEARNin, Landscapes, 16(1), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v16i1.1096
LeRue, D., Wells, C., Urquhart, K., Kim, J. K., Shanahan, B., Aresnault-May, S., & Kuehn, N. (2024). Community-Based Art Education in a Pandemic World. Doing Arts Thinking: Arts Practice, Research and Education, 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004685253_006
LeRue, D. (2024). Landscape as method and model: Developing research-creation in community through landscape painting and pedagogy in Montréal’s Sud Ouest. Concordia University (Canada).
Lombard, L. (2025). The interpretation of relationships: Fieldwork as boundary-negotiation. Ethnography, 26(3), 582-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381211069670
Lombardo, C., Novak, P., Flicker, S. & Making With Place Artists (2023). Making With Place: Youth Public Art Experiments. Art/Research International, 8(1), 142–172. https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29702
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
McGowan, T. (2024). Embracing Alienation: Why We Shouldn't Try to Find Ourselves. Watkins Media Limited.
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge.
Owton, H., & Allen-Collinson, J. (2014). Close but not too close: Friendship as method(ology) in ethnographic research encounters. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), 283-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613495410
Paris, D., & Winn, M.T. (Eds.). (2013). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. SAGE Publications.
Peña, N. S. (2023). Cerrucha's" Trinchera". A Feminist Artistic Response to the War Against Women. Asparkia: Investigació feminista, (43), 63-85. 10.6035/aSparkIa.7004
Pugh, A. J., & Mosseri, S. (2023). Trust-building vs. “just trust me”: Reflexivity and resonance in ethnography. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi:10.3389/fsoc.2023.1069305
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more-than-human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
Reeves, C. L. (2010). A difficult negotiation: Fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative research, 10(3), 315-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109360150
Schiavo, R. (2021). What is true community engagement and why it matters (now more than ever). Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 14(2), 91-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2021.1935569
Sévigny, M. (2021). La trajectoire incertaine du Projet Bâtiment 7. Revue Possibles, 45(2), 42-50.
Sihlongonyane, M. F. (2009). ‘Community development’ as a buzz-word. Development in Practice, 19(2), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520802689378
Singh, S., & Wassenaar, D. R. (2016). Contextualising the role of the gatekeeper in social science research. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 9(1), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.465
Springgay, S., & Truman, S.E. (2018). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: Walkinglab. Routledge.
Strawn, C. (1994). Beyond the buzz word: Empowerment in community outreach and education. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30(2), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886394302002
Parsons, T. (1991). The social system (New ed). Routledge.
Tri-council policy statement ethical conduct for research involving humans. (2022). [Policy Document]. Government of Canada. https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/documents/tcps2-2022-en.pdf
Tillman-Healy, L. M. (2003). Friendship as method. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(5), 729-749. http://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403254894
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal and contingency. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811- 818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530265
Ulbricht, J. (2005). What is community-based art education? Art Education, 58(2), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2005.11651529
Ulmer, J.B. (2017). Posthumanism as research methodology: Inquiry in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(9), 832-848. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1336806
Vaughan, K., Dufour, E., & Hammond, C. (2016). The “art” of the right to the city: Interdisciplinary teaching and learning in Pointe-St-Charles. LEARNing Landscapes, 10(1), 387-418. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v10i1.739
Wang, C., & Burris, M.A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
Wheatley, M. J. (2002). Turning to one another: Simple conversations to restore hope to the future. Berrett- Koehler Publishers.
Wolffer, L. (2022). Diarias Global Afuera [Participatory photography]. Ex-convent of El Carmen and Revolución Park, Jalisco Secretariat of Culture, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. https://lorenawolffer.net/2023/02/08/diarias-global-afuera/
Wolffer, L. (2025, September 27). About Lorena Wolffer. https://lorenawolffer.net/en/inicio-english/
Yow, V.R. (2014). Recording oral history: A guide for the humanities and social sciences (3rd ed.). Rowan & Littlefield.